目前无货。
欢迎选购其他类似产品。
选择配送地址

Sennheiser 森海塞尔 HD 560 S 头戴式发烧友耳机 - 中性频率响应,E.A.R. 宽音场技术,开放式耳罩,可拆卸电缆(黑色)(HD 560S)
Sennheiser HD 560 S Over-The-Ear Audiophile Headphones - Neutral Frequency Response

4.7 颗星,最多 5 颗星 988 评论
|
分享
分享
广告

目前无货。
欢迎选购其他类似产品。
  • 自然而准确的参考声音,显示您音乐中的真相
  • 开放式耳罩栩栩如生的深度和现实感,让声波自然扩张
  • 宽阔的音场,符合人体工程学的声学改进(例如 a.r.) 将司机倾斜到耳朵的自然角度
  • 扩展低端覆盖范围,令人愉悦的存在,带来清晰的低音性能
  • 连接技术:有线。连接器类型:1/4英寸(约0.6厘米)。包含组件:耳机、电缆、用户手册(不一定支持中文)
    • Natural and accurate reference sound that reveals the truth in your music
    • Lifelike depth and realism from open-back earcups that allow sound waves to expand naturally
    • Wide soundstage from ergonomic acoustic refinement (e.a.r.) that tilts the drivers to the natural angle of your ears
    • Extended low-end reach with gratifying presence for clear bass performance
    • Connectivity technology: Wired
    • Connector type: 1/4-inch
    • Included components: Headphones, Cable, Owners Manual

商品描述

HD 560S 沉迷于发烧友评估他们的音乐通过音频路径的整个旅程。 这款开放式耳机经过调整,以揭示音乐中的真相,而不会牺牲重现复杂现代音乐所需的令人满意的低音响应 —— 所有这些都具有突破性的价值。 其传感器具有角度,可重现最佳的三角形聆听位置,实现宽阔、清晰的音场。 HD 560S 的轻巧设计为听众提供了"几乎没有"体验,可延长聆听时间
会话。 低阻抗驱动器提供了灵活性,可以在几乎任何音频设备上重现高保真声音,例如便携式数字音频播放器、笔记本电脑、A/V 接收器、音频接口等。 可拆卸的 3 米电缆提供完美的自由度使用您的装备,并具有
6.3 毫米插头,带灵活的 3.5 毫米适配器。 准确度、宽音场、流畅的低音性能和长期聆听舒适度相结合,使 HD 560S 适合高保真爱好者和音乐任务。

产品信息

技术细节

更多信息

购买提示

1. 商品和服务差异
亚马逊海外购商品由亚马逊海外网站出售,适用使用境外网站所在的原销售地的法律、法规、标准、规范和惯例等,因此可能在以下方面区别于在中国境内出售的商品:
• 尺码:鞋服尺码表单位转换表。备注: 如果销售品牌提供了具体的尺码表,请以品牌尺码表为准。
• 电压和电源插座:电子产品可能不支持中国的电压环境、电源插座等规格标准,需配合变压或转换设备等使用。电源使用提示
• 美妆商品保质期:美妆商品的生产日期/保质期标注可能和国内渠道购买的产品有所区别,详见美妆商品购买提示
• 售后服务:亚马逊海外购的商品由境外网站所在的原销售地的品牌商提供售后保修,该等保修和其他售后可能不覆盖中国,详情请联系品牌商的售后咨询。
• 标签、手册和说明书:标签、手册和说明书等未译成中文;所载成分、声称、产品描述、参考值和推荐值可能与中国标准或惯例有别。
• 其他:因出售地和使用地人群(特别是儿童、老人和残疾人等)、使用环境、消费场景与习惯不同,可能导致商品不能或不能完全适用于使用目的。

2. 清关服务:
• 根据中国海关的要求,在您购买亚马逊海外购商品时,需要提交订购人的身份证信息(目前仅支持中国居民身份证信息验证)用于清关点击这里查看详情
• 亚马逊不会以任何理由索要您的银行卡号、验证码等信息。如遇不法分子冒充亚马逊海外购客服向您索取银行账号等信息,请及时通过联系亚马逊海外购客服或报警,敬请提高警惕。

3. 物流配送:
• 关于配送时间的预估仅供参考,实际配送受清关或天气等不可抗力因素的影响,您可在“我的订单”中跟踪包裹查看配送状态,如有疑问请联系客服咨询。
• 亚马逊海外购商品符合海关进出口政策要求,且支持中国除港澳台地区之外的全境配送,但部分偏远地区的配送时间会相应延长,少数商品不支持配送。如果您已成功下单而我们无法为您配送,我们会及时通知您。
• 亚马逊海外购商品目前不支持晚间送货、预约送货、自提等服务。

4. 其他:亚马逊海外购出售的境外商品仅限个人自用,购买行为必须遵循自用、合理数量原则,不得转为其他商业用途,不得再次销售。

5. 需要更多帮助,请查看亚马逊海外购帮助中心

买家问题和答案

查看问题和答案

无顾客评论

5 星 (0%) 0%
4 星 (0%) 0%
3 星 (0%) 0%
2 星 (0%) 0%
1 星 (0%) 0%

评论该商品

与其他买家分享您的想法

此商品在美国亚马逊上最有用的商品评论

美国亚马逊: 4.3 颗星,最多 5 颗星 229 条评论
M. Kraft
5.0 颗星,最多 5 颗星 A real bargain for the money
2020年12月18日 - 已在美国亚马逊上发表
已确认购买
70 个人发现此评论有用
C
5.0 颗星,最多 5 颗星 Save up and skip the SHP9500, these are the minimum and ideal value for open-backs
2021年3月29日 - 已在美国亚马逊上发表
已确认购买
39 个人发现此评论有用
misternef
4.0 颗星,最多 5 颗星 Neutral Nirvana
2021年3月29日 - 已在美国亚马逊上发表
已确认购买
32 个人发现此评论有用
Karen Range
4.0 颗星,最多 5 颗星 HD560S, good, but I'd buy the Sundara. (Comparison)
2021年6月1日 - 已在美国亚马逊上发表
已确认购买
买家图像
4.0 颗星,最多 5 颗星 HD560S, good, but I'd buy the Sundara. (Comparison)
2021年5月31日 在美国审核
This was originally a review for the Sundara compared to the 560S. I felt I should post it here too.

I'll be comparing the 560S to the Sundara throughout. Here’s how things will be weighted. Please keep in mind these scores are relative to the Sundara’s price, not to the 560S’s price. Also, please keep in mind that this is my opinion.

Box, Presentation, and accessories: 5%

Build and Comfort: 20%

Bass: 10%

Mids: 15%

Treble: 15%

Soundstage/Imaging: 15%

Technical Performance: 20%

Box, Presentation, and accessories:

The Sundara comes in a very nice box that has a fake velvet-like material lining the inside. The pads come a bit squashed, but even out quickly. Comparatively, the 560S’ box is basic, but works. Neither should be damaged in shipping.

Sundara comes with a short 3.5mm to dual 3.5mm cable, which is of ok quality. It coils a bit, but isn’t terrible. It ends in a 90 degree plug, which shouldn’t be a thing. They are trying to market this as a “mobile friendly” headphone, which it isn’t, so that 90 degree plug is useless and gets in the way. It also includes a 3.5mm to quarter inch adapter.

The cable that the 560S comes with is terrible. Like the worst cable I have ever had kind of bad. Even worse than the X2HR’s cable. It’s way too long and terminates in a quarter inch. They do this because the 5XX series of Senns were bought alot by people with home stereos. Because of the long length and termination, it is a pain to use with a desktop amp and a nightmare to use with my portable DAC/amp. You have to use an included \~5 inch adapter to convert to 3.5mm. Why not just terminate in 3.5 to begin with? Awful cable.

Sundara: 7/10

HD560S: 2/10

Comfort and Build:

My first experience with Sundara in the comfort department was not good. The 2018 version clamped too much, jabbed my ears, and caused jaw pressure issues. I am happy to report that the 2020 version has fixed all of those issues. The only other remaining issue is that the ear cups are a bit small, and my ears can get crowded at times, but it's not bad. I have a larger than average head, and my ears are very sensitive on the outside. Guys, I am very picky about comfort, and I think Sundara is fine. For context, I sent back the SHP9500 because they were uncomfy to me. The 560S would have been great if not for two things. They have plenty of space for my ears on the inside, but there is a protrusion at the back that pokes them and hurts very quickly. They also have an uneven strong clamp on my face, which doesn’t help. I could make them work, but the Sundara are better. Of course, after a while, both become uncomfy, but that happens to almost anything.

For the build, it's interesting. Usually Hifiman has the worse build and Sennhieser the better, but it's the opposite this time. The Sundara are built very well, almost completely out of metal. The only issue is the adjustment mechanism scratches the metal and leaves a silver tone. Not a huge deal, but odd that it happens and they haven’t fixed it yet. I guess it’s a sure fire way to check if they have been used yet or not! The 560S are comparatively made out of mostly plastic, and feel somewhat cheap. They are a lot lighter though, and I would actually expect them to last longer than the Sundara due to the 5XX series’ reputation for longevity.

Sundara: 8/10

560S: 6.5/10

Sound:

Bass:

Overall, the Sundara have better bass. I feel that it is more present over the anemic 560S’ bass response, and it is faster and quicker. The Sundara feels like it has a more impactful bass due to it’s excellent punch and slam qualities. You also can EQ the Sundara’s bass to your heart’s extent, not so much on the 560S. Obviously, the Sundara still has fairly neutral bass, but it’s right in line to where I prefer it.

Sundara: 8.5/10

560S: 7/10

Mids:

Both headphones have good mids, but the 560S has more present mids, almost to its detriment sometimes. The 560S can get shouty in comparison to the Sundara, while not gaining any resolution from the heightened mids response. The Sundara may even have better resolution here even while not being as forward in the mids. The Sundara’s mids are just, really good. Nothing really to say about them because they are so transparent and neutral. Right where they should be. The 560S is a bit more shouty and present, and you may like that. I can describe the shout as like the flare of the sun’s rays through glasses. It physically hurts, and prevents you from seeing what you want to. The 560S does the same thing to music very occasionally, and the Sundara does it much, much, less.

Sundara: 9/10

560S: 8/10

Treble:

This is interesting. The 560S and Sundara both have excellent treble for the price, and are somewhat similar to one another, but the Sundara is much more refined. It has better resolution and a more controlled and smoother response. Both have peaks, and both have sibilance, just at different spots. The 560S sounds a bit more “grainy” here and isn’t the resolution king at $200. The Sundara *IS* the resolution king at $350 though. Don’t fall into the hype, the 560S is not creating detail on the level of HD 6X0. The Sundara exceeds HD 6X0 handily. I feel that the 560S is a on the side of bright neutral, while the Sundara is more close to neutral in the treble response. The Sundara is definitely where I would like it to be more, it doesn’t sound as harsh or overbearing as the 560S.

Sundara: 9.5/10

560S: 7.5/10

Soundstage and Imaging:

I’m not the best here, but I can definitely tell that the Sundara has a much larger stage than the 560S. The 560S is much larger than HD 6X0, but the Sundara destroys it. The 560S would be described as more “flat” as not as vertical, and more “accurate” to the original recording, but the Sundara just gives a more surrounding and deep soundstage. The Sundara is more layered and more encompassing. The Sundara still isn’t the best at the price though, about average in width. For imaging, both are amazing for the price, but the Sundara is better.

Sundara: 8.5/10

560S: 6/10

Technical Performance:

This is where Sundara shines. The overall sense of clarity and resolution is excellent here, and the distinction between individual sounds is some of the best that I have heard. Sundara also has an excellent punch and slam. The 560S is not slouch for $200 though, but it cannot compare to the Sundara. It is lower resolution, can’t show sounds as distinctly, and is very shy on punch and slam. Clarity is very good for the price though, but this could be due to the slight tilt toward brightness.

Sundara: 10/10

560S: 7/10

Side Note: Power Requirements

I would recommend an amp with both, but you can probably get away without one with the 560S. I feel that Sundara really needs an amp. On most devices I tried, I either could not get enough volume or had to crank it to get to an ok listening level.

Overall Score and Value Conclusion:

Sundara: 8.2/10

560S: 6.2/10

So, if it isn’t obvious, Sundara is better. It should be better, because it costs $150 more. The 560S isn’t bad at all though. In a price-relative rating close to $200, it would have scored at least and 8 I would predict.

If you can pay the extra, I would for Sundara. It is just the superior headphone in most every aspect. If you want a transparent, accurate, and detailed jack of most trades then look no further than the Sundara.
该评价的图片
买家图像
买家图像
23 个人发现此评论有用